Tuesday, October 25, 2005
有情郎
不過你 不在 身旁
誰願浪蹟 誰願逃避
都付出了 真心
我也想 當有情郎
不過說 做又不一樣
誰會浪蹟 誰又逃避
碎了我 真心
是誰讓誰 又再要掉眼淚
是誰讓他 代替我氣味
結局總是 選擇了要分手
開不開始 都一樣
沒有了你在我的身旁
擺脫 是我
我會盡量好過
我也想 當有情郎
不過說 做又不一樣
誰會浪蹟 誰又逃避
碎了我 真心
是誰讓誰 又再要掉眼淚
是誰讓他 代替我氣味
結局總是 選擇了要分手
開不開始 都一樣
沒有了你在我的身旁
擺脫 是我
我會盡量好過
是誰讓誰 又再要掉眼淚
是誰讓他 代替我氣味
結局總是 選擇了要分手
開不開始 都一樣
沒有了你在我的身旁
擺脫 是我
我會盡量好過
------------------------------------
近來很喜歡的一首歌
Sunday, September 18, 2005
I took another test....
The Super IQ Test
How Smart Are You Really?
Angie, your Super IQ score is 105
Your overall intelligence quotient is the result of a scientifically-tested formula based on how many questions you answered correctly. But it's only part of what we learned about you from your answers on the test. We also determined the way you process information.
The way you think about things makes you an Intuitive Interpreter. This means you are a highly conceptual thinker. Rather than focusing on facts and figures, you look at the big picture. You are less inclined to need to walk through something step by step to understand the logic behind it. This also lets you make connections between something you learned three weeks ago and something you are learning today. While other people need those types of connections pointed out for them, you just naturally make them.
How did we determine that your thinking style is that of an Intuitive Interpreter? When we examined your test results further, we analyzed how you scored on 8 dimensions of intelligence: spatial, organizational, abstract reasoning, logical, mechanical, verbal, visual and numerical. The 3 dimensions you scored highest on combine to make you an Intuitive Interpreter. Only 6 out of 1,000 people have this rare combination of abilities.
Thursday, September 15, 2005
Britney 'gives birth to baby boy'
Spears is said to have given birth by Caesarean section |
Photographers are waiting outside a hospital in Los Angeles after reports that singer Britney Spears has given birth to a baby boy.
The pop star, 23, gave birth by Caesarean section on Wednesday, US Weekly magazine said on its website.
Spears and husband Kevin Federline are said to have been taken to the UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, under police escort, early on Wednesday.
But the birth is yet to be confirmed by her representatives.
The US Weekly report said that Spears gave birth just before 1300 local time (2100 BST) on Wednesday.
It also quoted unidentified sources claiming the child would be called Preston Michael Spears Federline.
However, hospital officials have so far declined to comment.
Speculation
Reports published earlier this week claimed Spears had given birth on Sunday.
But the rumours were subsequently denied by her UK publicist.
"Britney Spears has not given birth," he said. "She's not even in hospital. The baby is due some time in the next month."
Britney Spears wed Kevin Federline in September 2004 |
The singer's spokesman has been quoted again on the Sun's website on Thursday, saying he could not confirm the birth.
"I wish I could give you details about the weight and when the baby was born, but I have no information to give yet," David Frostman is quoted as saying.
Spears married dancer Federline, 27, in September 2004 after they had been together for just six months.
She confirmed her pregnancy in April following months of feverish tabloid speculation.
Federline has two children by his ex-girlfriend, actress Shar Jackson, one of which was born after he and Spears started dating.
In the October issue of Elle magazine, Spears said she was looking forward to motherhood.
"It's mindblowing having a child," she said, adding that she planned on being "a hot mom".
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
What is your IQ?
結果是:
Congratulations, Angie!
Your IQ score is 127
This number is based on a scientific formula that compares how many questions you answered correctly on the Classic IQ Test relative to others.
Your Intellectual Type is Precision Processor. This means you're exceptionally good at discovering quick solutions to problems, especially ones that involve math or logic. You're also resourceful and able to think on your feet. And that's just some of what we know about you from your test results.
對我來說不錯,原來智力還是有點的,哈哈!
Thursday, September 08, 2005
香港人....細個一定會做過既57件事
1.玩米缸,將手插入米缸裡面o既米裡面篤下篤下。
2.在百貨公司入面篤扶手電梯旁的吊牌。
3.地下有階磚時,特登隔一格一格o黎行(不可踩界,要完全在格內)。
4.用錶面反射陽光,照o黎照去。
5.跳樓梯(愈多級愈勁)。
6.行路上高起左地方(例如高起左o既長條型石博,好似玩平衡木咁行法)。
7.鋪張紙在硬幣上面,然後用鉛筆係上面油,油返個形出o黎。
8.食完瑞士糖之後,將糖紙包番個原本四四方方果個形出o黎。
9.超級市場踩住架購物車o黎行。
10.踩水"tum",係好特登果隻。
11.吹口水波。
12.搣牆上的乳膠漆或牆紙。
13.係平滑o既地面上面"冼"下"冼"下咁行。
14.整濕o的紙巾,掟上學校廁所天花頂。
15.食完綠箭香口膠,一定摺返成張包裝紙,再放返入個大套入面。
16.響課室玩俄羅斯輪盤,將玩粉刷霑滿粉筆粉,放係風扇上面,等個風扇轉 轉下,轉得怏個時飛出o黎,睇下個粉刷中邊個。
17.放膠袋(當風爭甘放)。
18.去後梯執咸書睇,張睇完的咸書撕開飄落街。
19.貼張龜仔紙嚮o的同學背背脊果度。
20.踩人地個影。
21.狂踩人地對白飯魚,尤其是大肥仔果o的。
22.用幾條橡筋射o的同學。
23.掉人地門口的拖鞋落街。
24."蚊"消防喉,射水落下面個球場,睇下射到幾遠。
25.擇水彈。
26.用氣鎗射街上的途人。
27.玩千揪,"fing"到咁上下就飛出去鬥遠。
28.落樓梯時坐係o的扶手上面"sir"落黎。
29.在自動梯行相反方向。
30.把"誤投信件"或沒有用的宣傳單張,胡亂放入其他的住宅信箱。
31.坐地鐵時,抓緊中間的扶手,地鐵一開動博命繞住轉(自轉)。
32.在月台上鬥快跑。
33.帶玩具返學。
34.用圖釘弄穿學校壁佈板。
35.亂按人家的門鐘,然後鬆人。
36.明知過了三歲,仍然不買票,"捐"地鐵的入/出閘機。
37.用改錯水(很舊的有一個掃那種)附送的天拿水,搽在手上。
38.在井字型公屋中間的大天井中放紙飛機,或者放紙青蜒,看看誰放的紙青蜒最慢由廿幾樓落到地面。
39.煲蠟。
40.把汽水罐靜雞雞放在校車的車輪下攝住,開車時把它壓扁。
41.圍閹
42. 呵尿時出力射走 D 屎積
43.膠袋裝滿水掉落樓下
44.將紙碎或者紙飛機撒落街
45.將bubble紙氣泡逐粒"鏈"爆
46.o係屋企走廊玩"壁虎功"
47.走到開動緊電風扇面前:"呀~~~~~~~~!"
48.用間尺好似 "搖搖板"咁彈起舊擦膠
49.寶貼當泥膠,用間尺整pizza
50.係屋企撩鼻屎然後抿落牆
51.將 d 擦膠碎 用尺切粒粒
52.膠水搽係手/筆盒上 , 等佢乾之後成塊 met 出黎 ~
53.洗手時用手頂住個出水位,用d水去射周圍d人
54.同隔離位鬥快開哂筆盒d機關
55.飛拖鞋
56.特登將飲完的紙包飲品吹脹然後放在地上,大力地踩爆佢
57.用泥膠塞電制/電話插蘇
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
小評
不知為何,這幾天留意那邊的災情時,常常會看見一個景像:
受災的居民,好像都只是黑人,如果關掉電視機的vo,會以為所謂的New Orlands為一個非洲的第三世界國家。好了,好不容易看到白人,大多都是遊客,或者是在沒受大影響的家裡高舉"You loot, I shoot"的一家人。到政府完全徹走體育館的人時,不肯走的,又是黑人,白人呢,卻不知為何會幸運地經過幾天後和自己的家人團聚。
如果,留下來的都是沒有條件或不肯走的人,那麼,那些人一定是黑人嗎?
誠然,我個人亦認為其中一張照片的Caption一定有偏見,但由於兩張相真的屬於兩間傳媒,我真的不可以說什麼。可是,當外電的新聞片段都有這麼嚴重的偏頗的時候,我真的體會到種族歧視,其實一向都沒有減弱的跡象。
素來對美國這個所謂“最富裕國家”的政策和人民觀念有不太好的評價,但這件事令我更加不喜歡這個國家。看著這幾天他們不斷被投訴救災工作,甚至連國家領導人訪問也會突然改變口風時,不禁要問句:知不知道甚麼叫現眼報,和「醜(shame)」字是怎樣寫的?
Monday, September 05, 2005
NYTimes.com: Who's a Looter? In Storm's Aftermath, Pictures Kick Up a Different Kind of Tempest
Who's a Looter? In Storm's Aftermath, Pictures Kick Up a Different Kind of Tempest
By TANIA RALLI
Published: September 5, 2005
Two news photographs ricocheted through the Internet last week and set off a debate about race and the news media in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Dave Martin/Associated Press
Information from The A.P. photographer
described this young man as looting.
The second photo, also from New Orleans, was taken by Chris Graythen for Getty Images and distributed by Agence France-Presse. It shows a white couple up to their chests in the same murky water. The woman is holding some bags of food. This caption says they are shown "after finding bread and soda from a local grocery store."
In a similar visual circumstance, the
white couple was described by a different
The contrast of the two photo captions, which to many indicated a double standard at work, generated widespread anger toward the news media that quickly spread beyond the Web.
On Friday night, the rapper Kanye West ignored the teleprompter during NBC's live broadcast of "A Concert for Hurricane Relief," using the opportunity to lambaste President Bush and criticize the press. "I hate the way they portray us in the media," he said. "You see a black family, it says they're looting. You see a white family, it says they're looking for food."
Many bloggers were quick to point out that the photos came from two different agencies, and so could not reflect the prejudice of a single media outlet. A writer on the blog BoingBoing wrote: "Perhaps there's more factual substantiation behind each copywriter's choice of words than we know. But to some, the difference in tone suggests racial bias, implicit or otherwise."
According to the agencies, each photographer captioned his own photograph. Jack Stokes, a spokesman for The A.P., said that photographers are told to describe what they have seen when they write a caption.
Mr. Stokes said The A.P. had guidelines in place before Hurricane Katrina struck to distinguish between "looting" and "carrying." If a photographer sees a person enter a business and emerge with goods, it is described as looting. Otherwise The A.P. calls it carrying.
Mr. Stokes said that Mr. Martin had seen the man in his photograph wade into a grocery store and come out with the sodas and bag, so by A.P.'s definition, the man had looted.
The photographer for Getty Images, Mr. Graythen, said in an e-mail message that he had also stuck to what he had seen to write his caption, and had actually given the wording a great deal of thought. Mr. Graythen described seeing the couple near a corner store from an elevated expressway. The door to the shop was open, and things had floated out to the street. He was not able to talk to the couple, "so I had to draw my own conclusions," he said.
In the extreme conditions of New Orleans, Mr. Graythen said, taking necessities like food and water to survive could not be considered stealing. He said that had he seen people coming out of stores with computers and DVD players, he would have considered that looting.
"If you're taking something that runs solely from a wall outlet that requires power from the electric company - when we are not going to have power for weeks, even months - that's inexcusable," he said.
Since the photo was published last Tuesday Mr. Graythen has received more than 500 e-mail messages, most of them supportive, he said.
Within three hours of the photo's publication online, editors at Agence France-Presse rewrote Mr. Graythen's caption. But the original caption remained online as part of a Yahoo News slide show. Under pressure to keep up with the news, and lacking the time for a discussion about word choice, Olivier Calas, the agency's director of multimedia, asked Yahoo to remove the photo last Thursday.
Now, in its place, when readers seek the picture of the couple, a statement from Neil Budde, the general manager of Yahoo News, appears in its place. The statement emphasizes that Yahoo News did not write the photo captions and that it did not edit the captions, so that the photos can be made available as quickly as possible.
Mr. Calas said Agence France-Presse was bombarded with e-mail messages complaining about the caption. He said the caption was unclear and should have been reworded earlier. "This was a consequence of a series of negligences, not ill intent," he said.
For Mr. Graythen, whose parents and grandparents lost their homes in the disaster, the fate of the survivors was the most important thing. In his e-mail message he wrote: "Now is no time to pass judgment on those trying to stay alive. Now is no time to argue semantics about finding versus looting. Now is no time to argue if this is a white versus black issue."
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
開心大發現
沒有結果的事情,任誰都不想做
但人有時卻想做一些事情,是沒有理由,亦不用承擔所帶來的結果。
原大最大的煩惱,永遠都是自己找的。
哈,那裡來的傻勁寫下這些東西呢?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The book of answers
我前後推薦了不少人買這本書,但自己就總沒有買。其實我認為以我的使用量,買一本也不足為過,但就是衝不破買下它的心理關口。
前一天到page one看書,又走到它面前,問了第一個問題:
“我會得到xxx這份工作嘛?”
“Settle it Soon”
“那‧‧‧即是得到嘛?”
“You must”
我不明白這是you must settle it soon,還是等於you must get the job, so settle it soon,還是其他意思呢?我當然希望是後者,因為前者的解釋對我來說好像是對我說“還是快點收拾好心情,不要再想了”的感覺。
上星期找朋友打聽,他說我是三位最後人選的其中之一;前兩天問的時候,原來他們還正在接見更多人。我現在還是那個最後三位,真的不得而知。可是,那位接見我的人竟然對我的評價是“很成熟,似做公關多一點”的時候,我確實有點失望,因為我一向不想被人定型成為這種人。畢竟,為了看起來年輕一點,面試那天我只是穿了t-shirt牛仔褲呀!
Monday, August 15, 2005
Before Sunrise/ Before Sunset
其實我是知道有Before Sunset,才知道有Before Sunrise這齣戲。畢竟第一集是九四年的作品,那時Ethan Hwake對我來說就只有Reality Bites這電影,其他的都不知道了。看完之後,我亦相信我在當時必定會覺得這齣戲很悶,沒意思。因為戲裡的對白很多很快,真的不是很年輕的人能看得懂。直至第二集的出現,影評看多了,才知道原來有一班人可以這麼有心機,於拍畢第一集之後念念不忘戲裡那個留給觀眾的尾巴,從而令到男女主角和導演於這九年以來一直構思它的第二集。
記得那天在vcd店,我真的想了很久才買下這兩隻dvd。一是因為沒有特價(雖然我到的那間vcd店已經比同區其他店鋪便宜),二是因為我實在沒有太多機會去完成兩齣戲。可是,聽著早前AL跟我說很喜歡戲中男女主角於第一集裡那種愛情觀,所以便把心一橫把它們買下來。
誠然,我相信每位擁有這兩集dvd的人,都必定會把它們一口氣看完 ─ 總得看看男女主角是怎樣收場,或是那幕「懷疑」sex scene到底有沒有發生罷!我甚至開始有點明白,為何男女主角自己亦於拍完Before Sunrise之後,會念念不忘這個故事的發展,想要替自己、製作人和觀眾有一個好點的交代。
Before Sunrise裡的愛情觀嘛,不錯,真的很特別,而且對於一個廿幾歲的我來說,真的永遠不會過時。有時候,看見一個自己喜歡的人,真的可以暫時放下自己生活中那些包袱,好好的和自己喜歡的人珍惜時間去談一場戀愛。男女主角刻意不交換任何聯絡方法的心態很特別,但我亦十分同意他們的看法。故事的情節十分簡單,場景也不多,就是用了很多對白來表演男女主角的思想和行為,真的很像一對男女的交流。看完這電影嘛...如果我真的是那個年代的人,我相信我也會跟著他們的行程在坐坐火車,看看能不能遇見我的ethan hwake。
不過,可能是男女主角相信那時的戲迷都已經和他們一樣長大了,成熟了吧,到了Before Sunset,一切都好像是一個回歸現實的寫照。原來當年的那個承諾因為一個很實質的問題沒有兌現,大家看見對方時都不禁罵當年不留聯絡方法實在太蠢...更重要的,是男女主角原來都不能忘懷當年的那個她/他,而且心裡的那個人亦不斷改變著對方的愛情觀。看著他們,真的有點看出中年人的苦澀。老實說,第二集的結尾真的有點怪,算是令我們有多點想像空間,或是延續他們於第一集時的情懷,又或是想說是時候珍惜眼前人呢?我不知道。
但話說回頭,這兩齣戲對我來說最吸引的地方,又或是最一脈相承的地方,就是男女主角的對白。看著他們可以七八分鐘不斷說話而又不悶,真的十分佩服寫/演的人。他們真的是每一句對白都是有意思的,不是那些“你愛我嘛?”“我愛你!”那一種,而是有心靈,智力,知識的交流那種。而這些對白,又真的可以令我frame到男女主角的性格和心態,甚至亦可以令觀眾有很多想像空間。
看完這兩集,我真的想有第三集。可能是用來交代他們這九年來的事,雖然有點老土,但亦可以是個給這兩齣戲來一個完滿點的連接罷。可是,我亦在想,如果他們在第二集時已經刻意用很少flash back的時候,我相信他們應該都不會想這件「老土」事發生了。
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
是日金句
道理唔講講「陰質」
不知由何時開始,吾母會變得如此入世。
她只看看事件的部份,便能從容地於她燙衣服的時候得出一位行內老江湖想了一晚的結論;而她的一句說話,亦變成了今天公司的金句。
七個字,就這麼的七個字。佩服!
Sunday, August 07, 2005
最後的‧‧‧
忽然想起一首歌,from my idol, Miriam Yeung
遊戲都一早玩完
贏了慶祝
輸了氣便斷
來罷你想殺便殺
不必心軟
只望你心酸
活了這一千天
仍完成宏願 儘管苦短
情話若果一早已說完
童話亦迫不得已講過便算
Saturday, July 23, 2005
Thursday, July 21, 2005
閃電
沒有教科書或圖書,我是不知道閃電的情景是怎樣的。然而就算知道了,也從來沒有對這個自然景象多加留意。
第一次看見真正的閃電,好像是上月份在上海工幹。在車上塞車的時候,竟然看見天空有一條雷電閃過!雖然司機好像不太相信車上的乘客竟然是第一次看見閃電,但看著我不斷的追看閃電,也跟著我一起於塞車的時候討論起閃電來。
誠然,閃電這個自然現象是很平常的事,只是,看著上海的那一條條分明的閃電,發覺香港的天空好像真的太小了。只要一有閃電,面積小小的天空就會整個被照亮,待追看到閃電的方向,便已經太遲了。同一長度的閃電(容許我作一個完全不準的比較),在上海的天空顥得那麼渺小,無力‧‧‧
記得以前看過一段銀行或是信用卡的廣告,廣告裡的女主角一天到晚在她那擁有無敵海景的家裡不斷的用望遠鏡等呀等,終於有一天被她捕捉到一張完美的閃電照。那時候,覺得這個拍照行動是十分浪費和十分要求技巧。現在,我相信好一點的數碼相機,都已經足夠拍下這個完美的時刻。如果對相片質素沒有太大要求的話,相信我今晚開始守著窗外了。
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
東方188
感覺先是有一點心跳,但很快便平伏下來。
雖然有人比我更加緊張,可是我的心卻於那一下「離一離」的感覺後比誰也平靜。
沒有其他想法,因為不想自己想得太多、太遠。既然看見後大家都沒有什麼行動,哪用再放心機去擔心?
不過,這幾個星期,好像有點「開口中」的感覺,有一些人,很久沒有提,一提起,便會遇見;就算遇不到,也會被一些沒關係的人或無關的事撩起。
可能,這個7月就注定是回憶的月份‧‧‧
Monday, July 04, 2005
Truth or Dare
除了第一次在一班陌生人面前唱k歌之外,亦竟然玩了一個很久沒有玩的遊戲─Truth or Dare。
開始時總是這樣的:大家都選truth,因為sense不到問問題的難度;後來有人為了不想被問/問問題,便不斷令人選dare。
這個遊戲是要班有心玩和有心被玩的人完成才夠過癮,我相信這次亦算是罷。
我不知道有幾多人會於玩完這個遊戲之後反面收場,但我覺得今次不會。一來這次的問題不是那麼尖銳,沒有一些十分尷尬的問題出現,而且dare的內容亦可以算是雅俗共賞。大家在玩之前心底已經有一把尺,都不敢做一點越軌的行為。
不過當然,在玩這個遊戲的過程之中,也有一些東西是得到的:不是別人的秘密,是一種信任。有時候看著一個人怎樣問你問題,和怎樣給答案,其實都可以看出一個人對自己的信任程度,而我亦看到一點我以前看不到的一些事情。
小插曲:我從來都相信事無不可對人言,所以我一向都喜歡於這個遊戲裡選truth。可是這次,我真的遇到一個令我有一點尷尬的問題,就是被一個和我初戀男朋友一樣名字的男人問我我的初戀男朋友是怎麼樣的。唯一的答案,well,就是,一個和你同一個名字的男人罷!沒有更好的答案,但其實我也不明白這個問題的目的可在。
Friday, June 24, 2005
優質約會
當然有認真的時候,而中心思想亦當然是談論有關薑和她的哥哥。
別的不說,如果之前沒有和Erika吃過那頓發人深省的午飯,我絕對不會想出一向以來問題的徵結所在。雖然,我不知道我的分析是否正確,但有一件是我是肯定的:有時候一個只可共富貴,不可共患難的人,並非因為他們不肯和你同甘共苦,而是因為他愈幫愈忙,令到問題深化。如果大家身邊有後者的人,我相信跟他們相處,真的要多一點耐性和長今精神才可以。
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Saturday, June 18, 2005
What are friends
Friends, may not be with you all the time, but you will feel very comfortable to share something with them whenever you meet them, or you feel liked it... Like café Tsui Hwa!
Friends brings inspirations, and insights to some of the things that you have been take it for granted for years.
Friends enhances the ups and levels the downs. Don't find it irresponsible for levelling, coz you might also been levelled some day, some how.
Friends can catch up what have you been into in a amazing speed.
Friends are fortune tellers who won't ask for money


